Many
people mistakenly think of the Church as an organization. This understanding of
the Church is mistaken because it is inconsistent with what Scripture says
about the Church. Rather than an organization, the New Testament clearly
teaches that the Church is a living
organism of which Christ is the Head giving direction to believer’s who are
His Body. Yet as a living organism,
all local congregations or assemblies must be governed.
Three
types of church government emerged:
(1) Episcopal. Under this type of
government, bishops govern local congregations; typically one bishop will
govern a group of congregations. The simplest form of this type of church
government can be found in the Methodist church while the more complex form can
be found in the Roman Catholic Church. This type of church government is not
seen in the first century, it originated in the second century. Proponents
point to James, Timothy, and Titus for biblical support.
(2) Presbyterian. In this form of
government, a plurality of elders (the session) governs the local congregation.
The elders are elected by the people, therefore the elders represent the
people, and it is a representative form of government. Above the session is the
presbytery which is made up of all the teaching elders (ordained ministers) and
one ruling elder (lay elected elder) from each congregation in a district.
Above the presbytery is the synod and above the synod the general assembly
which is the highest court in this form of government. Both the synod and the
general assembly are comprised of ministers and ruling elders. There is very
strong biblical evidence that supports this form of church government in terms
of a plurality of elders; however, the New Testament says nothing about such
organization beyond the local congregation.
(3) Congregational. In this form
of government, the authority rests on the entire local congregation rather than
on someone who is appointed or elected to represent them as in the presbyterian
form of government. These local churches are autonomous; meaning no authority
outside that local body of believer’s has any power over that church. These churches
are also democratic, meaning all believers who belong to that particular church
make the decisions that guide and govern it. There is strong biblical support
for this form of government in the New Testament since we find many passages
that clearly indicate that all members of local congregations should be
involved in the decision-making process (Acts 6:3-5; 11:22; 14:23; 15:25; 1
Cor. 5:12; 2 Cor. 2:6-7; 8:19; 2 Thess. 3:14; 1 John 4:1).
Since elements
of both the presbyterian and congregational forms of government find strong
support in the New Testament, perhaps the best
form of church government would be the combining or bringing together of those
elements that have strong biblical support. For example, there is no doubt that
the local churches in the New Testament were governed by a plurality of elders
(presbyterian form of government), on the other hand, the New Testament also
shows that these local churches had no outside authority with power over them,
in other words, they were clearly autonomous and democratic (congregational
form of government).
Comments
Post a Comment